Stainless Steel 304 Welded Pipe

completely different stainless-steel grades

Under the regulation, this means making use of to Commerce to correct the error inside 5 days of the discharge of the final calculations or, if an extension is granted, within five days after the publication of the final determination. Commerce denied the request on January 17, 2001, on the bottom that errors made by respondents did not fall under the regulatory definition of “ministerial error,” and distinguished our decision in NTN Bearing’s on the bottom that the alleged errors here were not brought to Commerce’s attention earlier than the ultimate determination. Kanzen repeated its request that Commerce correct the alleged errors on February 1, 2000. Commerce rejected this request on February 6, 2001, on the grounds that it had already decided that the alleged errors were not ministerial, and since pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.224, the request was untimely.

(“Kanzen”) appeals the choice of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the final affirmative antidumping responsibility dedication issued by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). Kanzen argues that Commerce was required to appropriate an alleged error in its final dedication. We subsequently affirm the choice of the Court of International Trade.

Stock Thickness: 0.1-200.0mm
Production thickness: 0.5.0-200mm
Width: 600-3900mm
Length: 1000-12000mm
Grade:
200 series: 201,202
300 series: 301,304,304L,304H,309,309S,310S,316L,316Ti,321,321H,330
400 series: 409,409l,410,420J1,420J2,430,436,439,440A/B/C
Duplex: 329,2205,2507,904L,2304
Surface: No.1,1D,2D,2B,NO.4/4K/hairline,satin,6k,BA,mirror/8K

Standard��ASTM,AISI,SUS,JIS,EN,DIN,GB,ASME,ETC

We produce ASTM/ASME Grade 304, Grade 304L,304h, 316, 316L, 316H, 316TI, 321, 321H, 309S, 309H, 310S, 310H, 410S, 2205, 904L, 2507, 254, gh3030, 625, 253MA, S30815, 317L, Type 317, 316lN, 8020, 800, 800H, C276, S32304 and others special requirement stainless steel grade.

• The rules permit for only 30 days for Commerce to obtain feedback on ministerial errors and make any corrections to the ultimate dedication.
• The government argues that a respondent can easily check the accuracy of the data it submits to Commerce and notify Commerce of any errors it has made before the issuance of the final dedication.
• The government argues alternatively that Commerce’s refusal to correct Kanzen’s error after the ultimate willpower was not arbitrary and capricious.

Here, nonetheless, in context, it is clear that Congress intended to cowl only an error committed by Commerce itself, and there is no ambiguity within the statute. The statute requires Commerce to determine “procedures for the correction of ministerial errors in ultimate determinations.” 19 U.S.C. § 1673d .

In this case there isn’t a allegation that the error was or ought to have been obvious to Commerce before the ultimate willpower. We maintain also that the alleged errors weren’t obvious from the ultimate determination itself. Unlike in Koyo Seiko, where “he flawed computer tapes rendered each negative and positive dumping margins in extra of 16,000%,” 746 F.Supp. 4, the dumping margin in this case was a mere 7.fifty one%. Final Determination, 65 Fed.

The question introduced right here is whether Commerce erred in refusing to appropriate an alleged error in its final dedication on the bottom that the respondent, somewhat than Commerce, was the source of the error. We assume for functions of this enchantment that an error existed within the final dedication. On August 15, 2000, at the request of Commerce, Kanzen submitted a last electronic database reporting its United States gross sales. In this new submission, the credit score expense for sixty four gross sales was now reported as $42.00 per sale.

See 19 C.F.R. § 351.224 . Once Commerce has made an affirmative last dedication, the ITC has only forty five days to make an injury determination. The authorities argues that this expedited time-frame suggests that by no means after a ultimate dedication ought to Commerce be required to correct an error made by a respondent. errors,” that are required by 19 U.S.C. § 1673d. Moreover, Commerce’s own rules require the Secretary to “analyze any feedback acquired and, if applicable . On December 28, 2000, at some point after the publication of the final determination, Kanzen filed its first request with Commerce for the correction of alleged ministerial errors.

We have thousands tons stock of stainless steel sheet and coil with various size and grade,mainly include austenitic stainless steel, martens stainless steel (including precipitation hardened stainless steel sheet & coil), ferritic stainless steel, and duplex stainless steel.

Characteristics of Stainless Steel Sheet and Plate:
High corrosion resistance
High strength
High toughness and impact resistance
Temperature resistance
High workability, including machining, stamping, fabricating and welding
Smooth surface finish that can be easily clean

Related Sponsored Items

Kanzen had such a chance within the period after submission of its information on August 15, 2000, and another opportunity, albeit a quick one, when Commerce made obtainable the final calculations on December 20, 2000, which mirrored the allegedly misguided $42.00 entry for credit bills. This leads then to Kanzen’s second argument — that Commerce’s refusal to appropriate the error was arbitrary and capricious. The predicate for Kanzen’s argument is our determination in NTN Bearing Corp. v. United States, seventy four F.3d 1204 (Fed. Cir. 1995).